<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DBWS.NET &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dbws.net/blog/category/any-techy-stuff-bar-programming-and-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dbws.net/blog</link>
	<description>Software development mutterings and maybe a little something about myself.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Advanced Web Ranking Review</title>
		<link>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2011/05/10/advanced-web-ranking-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2011/05/10/advanced-web-ranking-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bolo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced web ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbws.net/blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advanced Web Rankings Independent Review Search Engine Optimization (SEO) practices are a routine part of my daily tasks and as a result, there is a variety of tools and resources which I make use of to accomplish these tasks. Without a doubt it has taken me quite some time to decide just which of these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Advanced Web Rankings Independent Review</strong></p>
<p>Search Engine Optimization (SEO) practices are a routine part of my daily tasks and as a result, there is a variety of tools and resources which I make use of to accomplish these tasks.  Without a doubt it has taken me quite some time to decide just which of these tools are worthy of a place in my virtual toolbox and which have been discarded in favour of an alternative product.</p>
<p>When one engages in an SEO campaign, determining and understanding the rankings of a web site is of paramount important, without this fundamental data it is difficult to track the performance of your campaign.  You could argue you can simply track a campaigns performance by a conversion rate, e.g. how many new customers your client is receiving or products being sold via their website but in order to carry out optimization you have to know what phrases are performing well, which are not and how changes made to a website are affecting these rankings.</p>
<p>There are many tools out there which will gather data for the rankings at the time of generation however to accurately track the success or failure or your efforts the historic data must also be available for you to review the campaign over time.</p>
<p>Typically many applications expect this to be a manual process whereby the data is first exported in the CSV (Comma Seperated Values) format prior to then being imported into Excel or another Spreadsheet application for data analysis.  Charting this data for visual representation would then require further manual intervention.</p>
<p>These manual methods are further complicated when we also decide that we want to track our rankings on multiple search engines.  Tracking the results simply on Google, Bing or Yahoo is becoming less of standard practice as vertical search is becoming more popular both by users as well as being pushed upon us by the search engines.  Local business &#038; service results should also be taken into consideration on the ‘local’ search engines, such as Google maps or places and Yahoo Listings.   If like me, you are marketing products that not only are aimed at one geographic location, you may want to also track results on country specific search engines such as Google.co.uk in addition to Google.com.</p>
<p>The manual approach of tracking these results, exporting the data and then importing it into various Excel workbooks is nothing short of an administrative nightmare, and tends to deter the SEO practitioner from regularly gathering and managing these statistics, which of course without this information will harm the SEO campaign and lead to an unhappy client.</p>
<p>This is where Advanced Web Ranking fits into the puzzle perfectly, it is made quite clear very soon when you start to use that product that it has been well thought out, addresses the common requirements of the modern search engine optimizer and I am pleased to see also that the product is regularly updated.  By regular updates I am not hinting there are high numbers of bugs that require frequent updates, this is not Windows I am referring to.  An example would be new search engine definitions, for a massive variety of countries are regularly added.</p>
<p>The ability to run your campaigns for different projects, with different search engines and of course different keywords and phrases all from a single product is itself in my opinion a standard set of features that all ranking tools should adhere to, however the features that initially caught my attention and drew me to the Advanced Web Rankings product was the reporting feature.</p>
<p>I really had been surprised at the sheer lack of products available for search engine optimizers that include any reporting features, at least of sufficient quality.   As I have mentioned and hinted at already, the manual process of generating data and manipulating spreadsheets to present data should these days be a technique to be found only in the history books, but many site rank reviewing products still do not include this feature.  </p>
<p>Ultimately the onus is on us as professional SEO’s to keep our clients well informed and up to date with the performance of the campaign.  After all they are paying us for the service so a product that allows us to create attractive reports ready to distribute to our clients with the click of the mouse is a must have tool.</p>
<p>Although I haven’t used it myself, Advanced Web Ranking provides an automation feature that allows you to schedule automatic updating of the keyword and phrase rankings and once complete, have the reports automatically generated and distributed.</p>
<p>I feel I must of course also point out any issues I personally have found with the product and the only niggling problem I have found, isn’t really a problem but more of a feature request anyway.  To improve the readability of the keyword rankings in chart form, Advance Web Rankings allows the user to specify a unique colour for each keyword.  What I would love to see is the ability to reset all colours and have a different colour automatically assigned for each keyword.  As when you have a campaign with many different keywords, if they all share the same colour it can make differentiating the keywords in the charts quite hard, you can specify the colours yourself, but a quick reset function would be great.</p>
<p>There are many other features provided in this tool which I fully intend to investigate further when time permits, such as a  <a href="http://www.advancedwebranking.com/feats-keyword-research-tool.html">keyword research tool</a> for example, but what I can say for certain is that for the features I required at the time, Advance Web Rankings does a great job and for the reporting and rank tracking alone deserves a spot on any SEO’s shelf who is serious about providing a good service to their clients.</p>
<p>For more information on Advanced Web Ranking, visit their website at  <a href="http://www.advancedwebranking.com/"><img src="http://www.caphyon.com/img/press/awr/small-box.png" alt="Advanced Web Ranking logo" /> http://www.advancedwebranking.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2011/05/10/advanced-web-ranking-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faxing Simple MAPI and Exchange Server 2003</title>
		<link>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2008/10/30/faxing-simple-mapi-and-exchange-server-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2008/10/30/faxing-simple-mapi-and-exchange-server-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bolo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.1.2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXCHANGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAXING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STRICTACCOUNTORDER]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbws.net/blog/2008/10/30/faxing-simple-mapi-and-exchange-server-2003/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Scenario: You have an application that uses Simple MAPI (from Outlook) to send Faxes.Â  The I.T. department then introduce SBS / Exchange Server into the company to manage users email accounts. Now Faxing no longer works.You get a NDR everytime you try and send.Â Â  Strange though as you can still send directly through outlook [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Scenario:</strong></p>
<p>You have an application that uses Simple MAPI (from Outlook) to send Faxes.Â  The I.T. department then introduce SBS / Exchange Server into the company to manage users email accounts. Now Faxing no longer works.You get a NDR everytime you try and send.Â Â  Strange though as you can still send directly through outlook so your software gets the blame.</p>
<p>Sample Non Delivery Report:</p>
<pre>Â  Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

Subject:Â  E-MAIL FROM XXXXXXXX
Â Â Â Â Â Â  Sent:Â Â Â Â  10/25/2008 10:21

The
following recipient(s) could not be reached:

Â Â Â Â Â Â  '0XXXXXXXXXXXX' on
10/25/2008 10:21
The message could not be delivered because the
recipient's
destination email system is unknown or invalid. Please check the
address
and try again, or contact your system administrator to
verify
connectivity to the email system of the recipient.

&lt;sbs.domain #5.1.2&gt;</pre>
<p><strong>The Solution:</strong></p>
<p>The problem is due to Exchange attempting to send the fax BEFORE the Fax transport gets a chance to.</p>
<p>To fix this, you need to make a registry modification on each workstation affected.</p>
<p>So in REGEDIT navigate to <strong>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\Common\MailSettings</strong></p>
<p>and ADD a new DWORD key named <strong>StrictAccountOrder Â Â </strong></p>
<p>Set the value to <strong>1</strong></p>
<p>You may have to restart Outlook for the change to take affect but that should solve the problem.Â  Outlook will correctly identify the Fax transport before trying to send the Fax via Exchange.</p>
<p>Further reading can be found here <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319820" target="_blank">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/319820 </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2008/10/30/faxing-simple-mapi-and-exchange-server-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sending a fax via email on vista. (MAPI)</title>
		<link>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2007/05/19/sending-a-fax-via-email-on-vista-mapi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2007/05/19/sending-a-fax-via-email-on-vista-mapi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 17:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bolo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbws.net/blog/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a few short notes to remind myself and anyone else how I got faxing working on vista. Firstly you must have Vista Business or Ultimate edition as they are the only Vista editions that ship with Windows Fax &#38; Scan. To configure Outlook to treat emails with the recipient format as [FAX:0123123] as faxes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few short notes to remind myself and anyone else how I got faxing working on vista.</p>
<p>Firstly you must have Vista Business or Ultimate edition as they are the only Vista editions that ship with Windows Fax &amp; Scan.</p>
<p>To configure Outlook to treat emails with the recipient format as [FAX:0123123] as faxes correctly, it must first be configured to use Fax Mail Transport.&nbsp;</p>
<p>To do this first make sure you run outlook as an administrator, to do this use explorer to navigate to &quot;/Program files/Microsoft Office/Office12&quot;, right click the Outlook application and select &quot;Run As Administrator&quot;.&nbsp; If you don&#39;t do this you will get errors when trying to add the fax mail transport.</p>
<p>Next when Outlook is loaded, Click Tools | Account Settings | Email tab &#8211; New&#8230; | Select Other &#8211; and highlight Fax Mail Transport and click Next.&nbsp; You should be prompted to restart outlook and that should be it.</p>
<p>To test, fire up Outlook again (the usual way &#8211; not as administrator) , create a new email and address it to [FAX:000] and click send.&nbsp; Once its sending you should see Windows Fax &amp; Scan pop up and attempt to process it.</p>
<p>You will then also be able to send faxes via MAPI. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2007/05/19/sending-a-fax-via-email-on-vista-mapi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XP Auto Logon</title>
		<link>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2007/02/15/xp-auto-logon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2007/02/15/xp-auto-logon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bolo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dbws.net/blog/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To enable the auto login feature in Windows XP do the following: Click Start &#124; Run &#124; Enter &#8220;control userpasswords2&#8243; (without quotes) Uncheck &#8216;Users must enter a user name and password to use this computer Click Apply &#8211; you will now be prompted for the username and password of the user you wish to automatically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To enable the auto login feature in Windows XP do the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>Click Start | Run | Enter &#8220;control userpasswords2&#8243; (without quotes)</li>
<li>Uncheck &#8216;Users must enter a user name and password to use this computer</li>
<li>Click Apply &#8211; you will now be prompted for the username and password of the user you wish to automatically login as.</li>
</ol>
<p>Thats it, just 3 easy steps.   Be aware of the additional security risk involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dbws.net/blog/2007/02/15/xp-auto-logon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

